<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t leave your fingerprints everywhere!</title>
	<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/dont-leave-your-fingerprints-everywere.html</link>
	<description>Search engine marketing blog by Peter van der Graaf</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Vondel Vastgoed</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/dont-leave-your-fingerprints-everywere.html#comment-31092</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/dont-leave-your-fingerprints-everywere.html#comment-31092</guid>
					<description>I have problems with my online reputation. Is there a way I can track who is posting negative comments about me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have problems with my online reputation. Is there a way I can track who is posting negative comments about me?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/dont-leave-your-fingerprints-everywere.html#comment-5728</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 07:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/dont-leave-your-fingerprints-everywere.html#comment-5728</guid>
					<description>One mistake I once made, was thinking they wouldn't take the effort to fingerprint my standard, almost unique, HTML buildup.

Although my spammy tactics where different with every site, they where all further investigated and most of them where a blatant break of the quality guidelines, they just had to be investigated manually to detect them.

I used different domain owners, dns-ses, ip-ranges, different linkerprints and nothing other than my standard HTML usage to pinpoint me. Let's hope they don't take the effort to manually detect the spam of some of my colleages, because I see fingerprints all over all their work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One mistake I once made, was thinking they wouldn&#8217;t take the effort to fingerprint my standard, almost unique, HTML buildup.</p>
<p>Although my spammy tactics where different with every site, they where all further investigated and most of them where a blatant break of the quality guidelines, they just had to be investigated manually to detect them.</p>
<p>I used different domain owners, dns-ses, ip-ranges, different linkerprints and nothing other than my standard HTML usage to pinpoint me. Let&#8217;s hope they don&#8217;t take the effort to manually detect the spam of some of my colleages, because I see fingerprints all over all their work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
