<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filters in Google Analytics</title>
	<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html</link>
	<description>Search engine marketing blog by Peter van der Graaf</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: How to Find Actual AdWords Search Query Triggered Using Google Analytics &#124; SEOptimise</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-97048</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-97048</guid>
					<description>[...] Step by step guide on how to setup a Search Query report in Google Analytics This information can easily be found in Google Analytics but, although the method is simple, it is not obvious; to be able to access this PPC goldmine you have to use filters. Until last week I didn’t even know the filters feature existed and even if I had I wouldn’t have been able to do the regular expressions stuff that our filters will need. For this reason I’d like to thank the Google Analytics Experts and the linklove blog for giving me some simple step by step instructions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Step by step guide on how to setup a Search Query report in Google Analytics This information can easily be found in Google Analytics but, although the method is simple, it is not obvious; to be able to access this PPC goldmine you have to use filters. Until last week I didn’t even know the filters feature existed and even if I had I wouldn’t have been able to do the regular expressions stuff that our filters will need. For this reason I’d like to thank the Google Analytics Experts and the linklove blog for giving me some simple step by step instructions. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-88820</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-88820</guid>
					<description>Hi All,

Any idea on how to create a filter to remove AdWords "(content targeting)" bounce rates from my reports.

My content targeting bounce rates are very high, but at .05 a click, who cares. I am running ads on the content network for brand exposure only. 

The high bounce rates are affecting my TRUE bounce rates and was hoping someone out there knew a quick fix.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!

Thanks,
-J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>Any idea on how to create a filter to remove AdWords &#8220;(content targeting)&#8221; bounce rates from my reports.</p>
<p>My content targeting bounce rates are very high, but at .05 a click, who cares. I am running ads on the content network for brand exposure only. </p>
<p>The high bounce rates are affecting my TRUE bounce rates and was hoping someone out there knew a quick fix.</p>
<p>Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
-J
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gerben</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-69107</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-69107</guid>
					<description>@peter,

Full referrer URLs I just needed this filter. I was going crazy about the forums wich use the phpBB platform. You can never see the exact url where visitors came from.

But in most cases it's major interesting to see what they wrote about you. :-)

Thanx...

Ps. how's life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@peter,</p>
<p>Full referrer URLs I just needed this filter. I was going crazy about the forums wich use the phpBB platform. You can never see the exact url where visitors came from.</p>
<p>But in most cases it&#8217;s major interesting to see what they wrote about you. :-)</p>
<p>Thanx&#8230;</p>
<p>Ps. how&#8217;s life?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BJ Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-39469</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-39469</guid>
					<description>Awesome Tips! I setup the filter, and tracked for a few days. After verifying 3 times with your website, I still couldn't figure out why I wasn't getting the correct stats. I simply wasn't checking in the "User Defined" section of analytics. There is a whole new section I was completely unaware of, thanks a ton!

BJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome Tips! I setup the filter, and tracked for a few days. After verifying 3 times with your website, I still couldn&#8217;t figure out why I wasn&#8217;t getting the correct stats. I simply wasn&#8217;t checking in the &#8220;User Defined&#8221; section of analytics. There is a whole new section I was completely unaware of, thanks a ton!</p>
<p>BJ
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-38869</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-38869</guid>
					<description>The 'Exclude URL Query Parameters:' dont seem to apply to these referal URL's. Is it possible to add custom filters to grab whats needed or to exclude parameters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;Exclude URL Query Parameters:&#8217; dont seem to apply to these referal URL&#8217;s. Is it possible to add custom filters to grab whats needed or to exclude parameters?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-27628</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-27628</guid>
					<description>Hi guys - great article. I've got a quick question. I want to filter Google natural search and Google blogsearch traffic out as seperate traffic streams. Does anyone know of a way to do this : I've not much hair left and that which I have is coming out by the handful in frustration.
Thanks in advance
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys - great article. I&#8217;ve got a quick question. I want to filter Google natural search and Google blogsearch traffic out as seperate traffic streams. Does anyone know of a way to do this : I&#8217;ve not much hair left and that which I have is coming out by the handful in frustration.<br />
Thanks in advance<br />
Michael
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Boris Juric</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-27535</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-27535</guid>
					<description>Several days ago these filters stopped working properly. I'm sure you are aware of that. But do you have a solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several days ago these filters stopped working properly. I&#8217;m sure you are aware of that. But do you have a solution?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-22343</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-22343</guid>
					<description>The problem is that Google normally doesn't allow for custom user segmentation. You can port specific variables to other ones and do some cross segmentation, but if you want the entire report specific for a group of visitors it is best to create a separate profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Google normally doesn&#8217;t allow for custom user segmentation. You can port specific variables to other ones and do some cross segmentation, but if you want the entire report specific for a group of visitors it is best to create a separate profile.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-22331</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-22331</guid>
					<description>Hi Peter

Can filters to include only certain sub-directories be viewed in our main analytics report or do we need to create separate reports and then set up the include filter for that report e.g. can I view a filter report for /products in our main site or do I need to create a Products report and set the filter up? (clear as mud!?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter</p>
<p>Can filters to include only certain sub-directories be viewed in our main analytics report or do we need to create separate reports and then set up the include filter for that report e.g. can I view a filter report for /products in our main site or do I need to create a Products report and set the filter up? (clear as mud!?)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-11448</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-11448</guid>
					<description>You can only fix this by running the referer data through a script on your page (PHP/ASP and Javascript can all do this) and passing it on to your favourite analytics variable. Variables like user defined of fake URL requests can then be read directly or filtered to show up in the adwords report.

I'm afraid I cannot help you any further, but a good programmer probably does this with great ease. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can only fix this by running the referer data through a script on your page (PHP/ASP and Javascript can all do this) and passing it on to your favourite analytics variable. Variables like user defined of fake URL requests can then be read directly or filtered to show up in the adwords report.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I cannot help you any further, but a good programmer probably does this with great ease. Good luck!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-11444</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-11444</guid>
					<description>Hi Peter,

Thank you for a very interesting blog. I found it yesterday and have nearly read all your posts now :)

I have tried to apply your filter for Google Analytics so I can see what Adwords searchers really typed, and i have started seeing the first results.

But because the keyword data comes directly from the referrer, there is some URL encoded characters. In english I think the only problem is the spaces that are converted to "+". But in Danish we have characters like æ, ø and å that are converted to "%C3%A6", "%C3%B8" and "%C3%A5" and in Sweden and Germany there are different "problem characters".

These characters make it hard to read the results. I have looked at the "find and replace" filter and tried letting it replace some of the characters, but it doesn't seem to work.

Can you help me with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Thank you for a very interesting blog. I found it yesterday and have nearly read all your posts now :)</p>
<p>I have tried to apply your filter for Google Analytics so I can see what Adwords searchers really typed, and i have started seeing the first results.</p>
<p>But because the keyword data comes directly from the referrer, there is some URL encoded characters. In english I think the only problem is the spaces that are converted to &#8220;+&#8221;. But in Danish we have characters like æ, ø and å that are converted to &#8220;%C3%A6&#8243;, &#8220;%C3%B8&#8243; and &#8220;%C3%A5&#8243; and in Sweden and Germany there are different &#8220;problem characters&#8221;.</p>
<p>These characters make it hard to read the results. I have looked at the &#8220;find and replace&#8221; filter and tried letting it replace some of the characters, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to work.</p>
<p>Can you help me with this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3834</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3834</guid>
					<description>The mentioned filter tracks referers. Something your browser transmits at a page request as extra information, it is not the requested URL itself.

I'm guessing http://www.mysite.com?channelxyz stands for the URL within your website at the recieving end of a campaign. In many cases you want to have both linkpoints and campaign tracking, so there is something extra you need to do.

I won't go in to everything with great detail, but the way I do it is the following:
- Linkpoints need to be focussed at one unique url. Separate tracking URLs with the same content will be filtered by search engines, so we need to 301 redirect to the one URL that can score. For instance the same url without campaign tracking information.
- Before returning a 301 header to a browser or searchbot, you cannot return any html or javascript. So you need to find another way to communicate a command to Google analytics. This is done by saving the campaign to session data (server side) with PHP or ASP. When the 301 redirect is executed, the recieving URL needs to check for session information and communicate it to Analytics. It should be communicated as campaign variables without using them in your url &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27248" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27248&lt;/a&gt;

Good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mentioned filter tracks referers. Something your browser transmits at a page request as extra information, it is not the requested URL itself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing <a href='http://www.mysite.com?channelxyz' >http://www.mysite.com?channelxyz</a> stands for the URL within your website at the recieving end of a campaign. In many cases you want to have both linkpoints and campaign tracking, so there is something extra you need to do.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go in to everything with great detail, but the way I do it is the following:<br />
- Linkpoints need to be focussed at one unique url. Separate tracking URLs with the same content will be filtered by search engines, so we need to 301 redirect to the one URL that can score. For instance the same url without campaign tracking information.<br />
- Before returning a 301 header to a browser or searchbot, you cannot return any html or javascript. So you need to find another way to communicate a command to Google analytics. This is done by saving the campaign to session data (server side) with PHP or ASP. When the 301 redirect is executed, the recieving URL needs to check for session information and communicate it to Analytics. It should be communicated as campaign variables without using them in your url <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27248" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27248</a></p>
<p>Good luck
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3830</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3830</guid>
					<description>Tremendous blog and blog post re: analytics filters. Thank you!

A question: If I am using a tracking URL of the format:

http://www.mysite.com?channel=xyz

Will the referring traffic filter you describe above track these specifically? Will it do so regardless of whether the link is placed on site xyz or typed directly into the browser?

Thanks again!!

--Craig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tremendous blog and blog post re: analytics filters. Thank you!</p>
<p>A question: If I am using a tracking URL of the format:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.mysite.com?channel=xyz' >http://www.mysite.com?channel=xyz</a></p>
<p>Will the referring traffic filter you describe above track these specifically? Will it do so regardless of whether the link is placed on site xyz or typed directly into the browser?</p>
<p>Thanks again!!</p>
<p>&#8211;Craig
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3373</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 08:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3373</guid>
					<description>Multiple people encountered the same problem, but my profile worked just fine. I just tested on someones profile that didn't work and outputted the raw URL data to the User Defined field. It seems the filter needs some tweaking for exceptions which I will probably do next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiple people encountered the same problem, but my profile worked just fine. I just tested on someones profile that didn&#8217;t work and outputted the raw URL data to the User Defined field. It seems the filter needs some tweaking for exceptions which I will probably do next week.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Traian</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3256</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 20:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-3256</guid>
					<description>I created a separated profile for the filter discussed here.

For the same period of time, I compared data obtained through each profile, in "Overall Keyword Conversion" statistics.

The number of clicks is not matching the data.

Let's say you have only one keyword, in broad, like "kewyword 1". The filtered list should contain all the combinations through which visitors comes to the web site - there are 40 of them. But, the unfiltered list contain 120 clicks for the broad match.

Where are the other 80 clicks? :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I created a separated profile for the filter discussed here.</p>
<p>For the same period of time, I compared data obtained through each profile, in &#8220;Overall Keyword Conversion&#8221; statistics.</p>
<p>The number of clicks is not matching the data.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you have only one keyword, in broad, like &#8220;kewyword 1&#8243;. The filtered list should contain all the combinations through which visitors comes to the web site - there are 40 of them. But, the unfiltered list contain 120 clicks for the broad match.</p>
<p>Where are the other 80 clicks? :(
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2140</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2140</guid>
					<description>This is the best solution in your case:
With PHP you define all domains in an array and check for them with php. Then you return campaign data to Analytics which can be used throughout many reports. You don't even need to create a separate profile.

Here it is in a separate text file: &lt;a href="http://www.vdgraaf.info/wp-content/uploads/checkdomains.txt"&gt;checkdomains.txt&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the best solution in your case:<br />
With PHP you define all domains in an array and check for them with php. Then you return campaign data to Analytics which can be used throughout many reports. You don&#8217;t even need to create a separate profile.</p>
<p>Here it is in a separate text file: <a href="http://www.vdgraaf.info/wp-content/uploads/checkdomains.txt">checkdomains.txt</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2129</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2129</guid>
					<description>Correct Peter,
I'm attempting to track traffic from any of the given referers.  I've agreed to pay a monthly fee for this company to place static text links on ~130 sites they control.  My goal is to measure if my spend is worth traffic.  Ideally, I would like to track the traffic identically as if I had a source variable in the link href on the partner sites.
Again, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct Peter,<br />
I&#8217;m attempting to track traffic from any of the given referers.  I&#8217;ve agreed to pay a monthly fee for this company to place static text links on ~130 sites they control.  My goal is to measure if my spend is worth traffic.  Ideally, I would like to track the traffic identically as if I had a source variable in the link href on the partner sites.<br />
Again, thank you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2127</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2127</guid>
					<description>For heavier user statistics I'd recommend using Clicktracks or Webtrends (or whatever other software gives good segmentation possibilities). Google Analytics just isn't build for this stuff.

I'm not sure if I get your question correctly. Do you want to "track 130 sites" or "separate 130 referers" in one account?

What you seem to be doing here is creating a separate account that just tracks traffic from any of the given referers. Excluding traffic from all other referers. But all this traffic is thrown onto one giant heap. For what purpose would you do such a thing?

If that is what you're trying to do and you get only half the traffic you should get it is always good to see what referer string is returned by analytics. Throw the entire string into the user defined variable, by using a the "Full referrer URLs" custom filter I've demonstrated in this article. Then see if your regular expression catches all the referers it should catch or if there are exceptions that you need to tweak the expression for. (&lt;a href="http://www.perl.com/doc/manual/html/pod/perlre.html" target="_blank"&gt;Perl regular expressions&lt;/a&gt;)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For heavier user statistics I&#8217;d recommend using Clicktracks or Webtrends (or whatever other software gives good segmentation possibilities). Google Analytics just isn&#8217;t build for this stuff.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I get your question correctly. Do you want to &#8220;track 130 sites&#8221; or &#8220;separate 130 referers&#8221; in one account?</p>
<p>What you seem to be doing here is creating a separate account that just tracks traffic from any of the given referers. Excluding traffic from all other referers. But all this traffic is thrown onto one giant heap. For what purpose would you do such a thing?</p>
<p>If that is what you&#8217;re trying to do and you get only half the traffic you should get it is always good to see what referer string is returned by analytics. Throw the entire string into the user defined variable, by using a the &#8220;Full referrer URLs&#8221; custom filter I&#8217;ve demonstrated in this article. Then see if your regular expression catches all the referers it should catch or if there are exceptions that you need to tweak the expression for. (<a href="http://www.perl.com/doc/manual/html/pod/perlre.html" target="_blank">Perl regular expressions</a>)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2124</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-2124</guid>
					<description>Peter,
I'm attempting to track traffic from a partner company that has ~130 sites.  I spoke with the GA guys at SES and they recommended that I set up a seperate profile and use the Custom Filter &#62; Include &#62; Filter Field: Referral and then type the list of the sites I wish to track seperated by a &#124;. 
For example:  &#160;www.siteA.com&#124;www.siteB.com&#124;www.siteC.com so on.  
However, the traffic is not reporting accurately.  

Because I wish for the text links to count for SEO purposes, I don't want to add tracking variables into the href.  Do you know how to isolate this traffic.  Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,<br />
I&#8217;m attempting to track traffic from a partner company that has ~130 sites.  I spoke with the GA guys at SES and they recommended that I set up a seperate profile and use the Custom Filter &gt; Include &gt; Filter Field: Referral and then type the list of the sites I wish to track seperated by a |.<br />
For example:  &nbsp;www.siteA.com|www.siteB.com|www.siteC.com so on.<br />
However, the traffic is not reporting accurately.  </p>
<p>Because I wish for the text links to count for SEO purposes, I don&#8217;t want to add tracking variables into the href.  Do you know how to isolate this traffic.  Thanks in advance.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1689</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1689</guid>
					<description>That should look something like this:
&lt;img src="http://www.vdgraaf.info/wp-content/uploads/filter-only-adwords.gif" alt="Filter for only adwords results" /&gt;
I haven't tested it because it is only applied to new visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should look something like this:<br />
<img src="http://www.vdgraaf.info/wp-content/uploads/filter-only-adwords.gif" alt="Filter for only adwords results" /><br />
I haven&#8217;t tested it because it is only applied to new visitors.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Linton</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1660</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1660</guid>
					<description>Hi Peter,

At the end of your post you list a possibility to view only adwords traffics in analytics. Can you describe what filter I need to set up to do just that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>At the end of your post you list a possibility to view only adwords traffics in analytics. Can you describe what filter I need to set up to do just that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1646</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1646</guid>
					<description>Hello Justin,

When you don't know what exactly a field returns, you can look at &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27218" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27218&lt;/a&gt; or test it by forwarding the raw information to the user defined field with a custom filter.

In the new or existing visitors case it is "New Visitor" or "Returning Visitor" without the quotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Justin,</p>
<p>When you don&#8217;t know what exactly a field returns, you can look at <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27218" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27218</a> or test it by forwarding the raw information to the user defined field with a custom filter.</p>
<p>In the new or existing visitors case it is &#8220;New Visitor&#8221; or &#8220;Returning Visitor&#8221; without the quotes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1630</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1630</guid>
					<description>Great post!
I never realized how powerful google analytics could be until I read your blog. To make a separate profile to look at just new visitors would you do something like this:
Filter Type: Custom
Exclude
Filter Field: Visitor Type
Filter Patter: (Returning Visitors)

Is that about right or am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!<br />
I never realized how powerful google analytics could be until I read your blog. To make a separate profile to look at just new visitors would you do something like this:<br />
Filter Type: Custom<br />
Exclude<br />
Filter Field: Visitor Type<br />
Filter Patter: (Returning Visitors)</p>
<p>Is that about right or am I missing something?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter van der Graaf</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1462</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1462</guid>
					<description>This is one of the problems with editing information Google Analytics uses throughout its reports. Analytics doesn't take altered data into account and therefore tweaking data should be done with the idea that the data might not be so trustworthy as the original one.

This is why I adviced to use a second profile or place the data in an unused placeholder (like "user defined" or fake page requests in a specific directory)

I tested the reports in some of my accounts and these seem to be OK, but that is no guarantee. At the moment I have no idea what caused it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the problems with editing information Google Analytics uses throughout its reports. Analytics doesn&#8217;t take altered data into account and therefore tweaking data should be done with the idea that the data might not be so trustworthy as the original one.</p>
<p>This is why I adviced to use a second profile or place the data in an unused placeholder (like &#8220;user defined&#8221; or fake page requests in a specific directory)</p>
<p>I tested the reports in some of my accounts and these seem to be OK, but that is no guarantee. At the moment I have no idea what caused it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arnoud</title>
		<link>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1432</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html#comment-1432</guid>
					<description>Hi Peter,

Thanks for your posts on using Google Analytic filters to find out what the Adwords searchers really typed. I was really looking for a hack like this.

I've copied your screenshot, but... it doesn't seem to work like it should.
I hope you can help:

When looking at my cpc-keyword report, the keywords are listed twice: 
keyword                     12.000 visits     50,2  pages/visit    conversion 2,1%
Keyword, (keyword)      5.000 visits       1,3  pages/visit   conversion    0%

When I look at the same report in my original profile the keyword is listed like this:
keyword                     17.000 visits       28,8  pages/visit conversion 1,7%

Have you got any idea what goes wrong? For every keyword the listing with brackets show an average pages/visit between 1 and 2 and not even 1 conversion.

Have you got any idea what causes this?

Thanks in advance,
Arnoud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks for your posts on using Google Analytic filters to find out what the Adwords searchers really typed. I was really looking for a hack like this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve copied your screenshot, but&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t seem to work like it should.<br />
I hope you can help:</p>
<p>When looking at my cpc-keyword report, the keywords are listed twice:<br />
keyword                     12.000 visits     50,2  pages/visit    conversion 2,1%<br />
Keyword, (keyword)      5.000 visits       1,3  pages/visit   conversion    0%</p>
<p>When I look at the same report in my original profile the keyword is listed like this:<br />
keyword                     17.000 visits       28,8  pages/visit conversion 1,7%</p>
<p>Have you got any idea what goes wrong? For every keyword the listing with brackets show an average pages/visit between 1 and 2 and not even 1 conversion.</p>
<p>Have you got any idea what causes this?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,<br />
Arnoud
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
